KARL ROVE'S BOOK "COURAGE AND CONSEQUENCE" SOUNDS DEMORALIZING, COME-BACK, DEFEATISM, TRYING TO MUDDY UP OTHERS; AND MORE OF THIS; MAR 16, 2010

Alert: Mrs. Dana Perino will be co=hosting Fox and Friends this FRIDAY!

Goal: we were tracking and investigating the Middle East campaign intently as scarcity of oil intensified the relationship between Man and God. In the Middle East, Israel is a spoiler. Israel is not an oppressor, they are lunatics. Therefore, the KGB wants to push them on America and the West so that it drives and fuels the reharmonization of Shiva and Sunni struggle. Like America, democracy is more fundamentally viable in the hands of the Shiva and a long term struggle depletes or demoralizes defenses. So first, you push Israel on us; in America you push crime or the mafia on us. Second, you fuel fundamentalism in the Shiva camps and their demands to Democratize on Fundamentalist zealously or dogma; that is the "New Revolution." The goal is to force power on those who are easy to brainwash or trick. You use violence or war as the instrument of civil war and drive the Sunni and Shiva apart; then usurp and manipulate the most powerful forces. If you are trying to take the Middle East, very similar to wars in Asia or communist revolutions, this is how you would create the conditions which topple and create the conditions that cannot be blocked, stopped, or spoken. It ends up on top of you and suppressing you because they are the leaders and control everything you do; it is never perfect or what you want; a negotiated peace. They end up the police and by Democratic forces, the authors of history. Without security, access and proximity allows them to become us and for us to dig deeper no matter what we do or say. As this digging deeper worsens, it gets worse and worse while they grew stronger and on top of it all. To stop or break it, you must find the eye of the storm and this is impossible. What we did was create it as the target; satellite warfare and the future. You get it all in one stroke; deliberate, unwanted, crippling, paralysis, unwindable, desperate, and intentional pollution.
___________________________________________________________________

BOOK REVIEW: Op-Ed Columnist, The New Rove-Cheney Assault on Reality, By FRANK RICH
BOOK REVIEW: 'Courage and Consequence' by Karl Rove/ A curiously empty memoir of what went on in George W. Bush's White House by the former president's political strategist. By Tim Rutten; latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-rutten9-2010mar09,0,621078.story

1. There is a canvas we describe as a history of abuse, thick skin, and efforts to brainwash or bring out the dark and negative side of a human being. They need to be shut down or expelled; why does it look bad for us? You need the right character who is angry or a total thief; decking them or signs of abuse is a big red flag. This can be parental abuse, some form of trauma, death or tragedy, or pure raw oppression.

IE: His own family was utterly dysfunctional -- his father, the book suggests, was apparently a closeted homosexual who ultimately divorced his mother, a habitual spendthrift who stole her children's legal support payments. Only as an adult did Rove discover he was adopted. He was a champion debater in high school and became so deeply involved in electoral politics that he never took a degree, though he was just a couple of classes short. Later, when enrolled briefly at the University of Texas, he would acquire a life-long admiration for William McKinley because his mastery of new electoral technology would usher in decades of GOP dominance.

2. His belief in God is similar to his beliefs in conservatism; more evangelicalism or street corner petty complaining. To some people who you hang out with and do photo ops with is who you are or become; an enemy in our mist or in our camp. They all use Reagan as if he was the Bible or religious recanting. They need to be shut down or expelled; why does it look bad for us? Now the complaints are in the wrong court or side; it is the opening to make an "introduction" or sell the unwanted.

IE: In the extensive news coverage leading up to Tuesday's publication, much has been made of his admissions of tactical error -- failing to push back against charges that the administration misled the country into the Iraqi war; botching the post-Katrina response; predictable score-settling with prominent Democrats. More interesting are the vague and largely unexamined origins of Rove's conservatism. As he tells it, he holds the views he does largely because he grew up in the mountain West, where self-reliance is prized, and because when, as a 10-year-old Denver boy, he put a Richard Nixon sticker on his bike, a little girl down the street whose family supported John F. Kennedy beat the heck out of him.

3. Karl Rove tries to make torture widespread and a part of the American lexicon or dinner table vocabulary. He then tries to paint a wide brush about how it works for America, works for him, and waterboarding will work for anybody else. Only in war time is the "Cruel and Unusual" clause suspended but the context of this use appears "Unconstitutional" and "wavering" on beliefs or errors. The only conclusion or consideration is the use by an enemy and an attempt to make it an instrument of government or a daily phenomenon (i.e. false arrest, error, failure, malpractice, insolence, stupidity, lunacy, theft, etc...) There are instances where "torture" or even "death" may be necessary and prudent but not to be used with no thought or consideration. The US Army does not include this in its manual for interrogation because it is so limited in use and controversial due to "cruel and unusual." They need to be shut down or expelled; why does it look bad for us?

IE: Rove the debater is at his dodgiest when he defends the Bush administration's break with generations of American moral tradition and jurisprudence by adopting torture as state policy. First, he attacks House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the congressional Democrats for denying their knowledge of the step: "Can we really expect CIA agents to carry out war policies if they fear that leaders of one of the two major political parties will punish them for good-faith efforts to protect America?" (There's a classic straw man, since no such retribution has occurred, despite considerable pressure from the Democratic left.)

4. Insanity. This is like saying they are with us, on our side, trying to help, this is their home, they are our teachers, they are in danger, etc... Notice now how it does not work for us, will not work for them, and will never work for anybody else; but it is the truth and cannot be argued; so they grow angry and use torture.

IE: Even Rove's most highly publicized admission of error -- though not quite an acceptance of responsibility -- comes with an explanation. As so many of the news stories based on leaked copies of "Courage and Consequence" have pointed out, Rove considers his singular shortcoming the failure to mount a push-back against those who charged the administration had misled the country into going to war in Iraq by falsely asserting Saddam Hussein's possession of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and by alleging his complicity in 9/11. One reason for the lack of rebuttal, the author writes, "was that we felt it was beneath the dignity of the president to refute such outlandish charges." Moreover, "many people in the Bush White House were simply worn down by the Iraq debate. . . . Our critics pounded us relentlessly. And the public saw silence as a plea of nolo contendere. With a complicit media that refused to subject the Democratic attacks to even the most mild fact-checking, many Americans eventually came to side with the administration's adversaries on this important question. . . ."The charge did what its critics had hoped. It weakened the Bush presidency. And those who led the charge [Rove singles out former Vice President Al Gore and Sens. Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid and John Kerry] did grave damage to their country's ability to win a war it was hotly engaged in. They must have known at the start this would happen, but it was a price they were willing, even eager, to have their nation pay."
___________________________________________________________________

By sabotaging and reversing their attacks, they were making demands for payments and using blame as a corporate spy and a cleverly hidden mole. A very dangerous and deadly enemy on our shores; this spy and global mover was blaming and demanding some form of payment after decades of spying and false reading. We showed them black when it was white; we told them blue when it was right; we did everything which they hated or despised in order to force their hand and deplete the oxygen in the brain; we did not like being kidnapped or this recurring rape dream where we are tortured for satellite secrets or treated like their golden goose and adopted children. Now they also face the charges of using satellite secrets as a payment or form of their idiotism and utter failure in the lives of others. They must have a lot of money to be doing this because we increase the punitive damages on them according to their effort and refusal to stop or attack. We are dealing with a deadly enemy and a spy mole so secret no human can bear to watch them in action as they lie, cheat, steal and fling feces at each other. So we have broken the back of the communist, terrorist, and this new breed of home schoolers. Now they have to spend another twenty or more years trying to figure out what went wrong and how to pull us back or rock the boat so hard we get dragged into their camp and mess. This crazed enemy does this well on our national politics and our country; to impact our life as a crazed stalker. One is brainwashed while the other is trying to brainwash us.